In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Celeron G3930 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $49 more expensive!
Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Celeron G3930
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 63% cheaper – $29.00 vs $78.02
- Up to 63% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.14 vs $0.42/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Celeron G3930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
182 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
93%
Price, $
$78.02
37%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
33%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 610 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
