In Borderlands 3, the Core i5-7400T is same performance as the Celeron G1610. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $29 more expensive!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Celeron G1610
- Up to 37% cheaper – $49.00 vs $78.02
- Up to 37% cheaper
- Up to 40% better value in Borderlands 3 – $0.18 vs $0.30/FPS
- Up to 40% better value in Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3 FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Celeron G1610: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
259 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
62%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
60%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
260 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Celeron G1610 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Celeron G1610 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
