In Deathloop, the Core i5-7400 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7400
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5520
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400 vs Xeon E5520: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$180.01
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400 vs Xeon E5520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400 vs Xeon E5520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
