In Atomfall, the Core i5-7400 is slightly slower than the Core i9-12900K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $109 cheaper!
Core i5-7400
- Up to 38% cheaper – $180.01 vs $289.00
- Up to 38% cheaper
- Up to 27% better value in Atomfall – $0.88 vs $1.20/FPS
- Up to 27% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall – 239 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400 vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
204 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
85%
Price, $
$180.01
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
239 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$289
62%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
73%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400 vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400 vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
