In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-7400 is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $81 more expensive!
Core i5-7400
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 251 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 45% cheaper – $98.95 vs $180.01
- Up to 45% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.39 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
229 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
91%
Price, $
$180.01
54%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
50%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
251 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
188 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
44%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
