In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-7300HQ is slightly slower than the Xeon X5677. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7300HQ
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 65% less energy – 45 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 65% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5677
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 238 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-7300HQ vs Xeon X5677: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Xeon X5677 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Xeon X5677 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7300HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon X5677
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.733 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7300HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5677 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $250.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1366 |
45W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
