In Rust, the Core i5-7300HQ is slightly slower than the Xeon W-3175X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7300HQ
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 45 vs 255 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W-3175X
- Up to 7% faster in Rust – 235 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Rust
- Is 2 years and 26 days newer – Jan 30, 2019 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 2 years and 26 days newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-7300HQ vs Xeon W-3175X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Xeon W-3175X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Xeon W-3175X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7300HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
14%
L3 Cache
6 MB
16%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Xeon W-3175X
Jan 30th, 2019
Cores
28-core
100%
L3 Cache
38.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7300HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W-3175X Jan 30th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 30th, 2019 |
$250.00 | MSRP | $2,999.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA3647 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 255 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
