In Deathloop, the Core i5-7300HQ is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7300HQ
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 45 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 229 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-7300HQ vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7300HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7300HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$250.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AM4 |
45W | Power Consumption | 105W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
