In Atomfall, the Core i5-7300HQ is slightly slower than the Core i9-9920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7300HQ
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 45 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9920X
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i9-9920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$698.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i9-9920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i9-9920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7300HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
31%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7300HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9920X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
$250.00 | MSRP | $1,189.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA2066 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
