In Atomfall, the Core i5-7300HQ is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7300HQ
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 219 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$420.2
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7300HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7300HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$250.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1200 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
