In Rust, the Core i5-7300HQ is slightly faster than the Core i7-920. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7300HQ
- Up to 5% faster in Rust – 218 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 65% less energy – 45 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 65% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-920
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i7-920: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
208 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
84%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i7-920 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i7-920 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7300HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7300HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| $250.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1366 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
