In Rust, the Core i5-7300HQ is slightly faster than the Core i5-3320M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7300HQ
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 218 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i5-3320M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
84%
Price, $
$65.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i5-3320M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i5-3320M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7300HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7300HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3320M Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| $250.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
