In Deathloop, the Core i5-7300HQ is slightly slower than the Core i5-3317U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7300HQ
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
Core i5-3317U
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 17 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i5-3317U: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i5-3317U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i5-3317U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7300HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-3317U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz
74%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7300HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3317U Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| $250.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 17 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
