In Deathloop, the Core i5-7300HQ is slightly slower than the Core i3-3210. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7300HQ
- Is 4 years and 2 days newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 4 years and 2 days newer
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 45 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
Core i3-3210
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i3-3210: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7300HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7300HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| $250.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1155 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
