In Atomfall, the Core i5-6600T is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-6600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Jul 02, 2015
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-6600T vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6600T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6600T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6600T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
62%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6600T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
$213.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
