In Atomfall, the Core i5-6600T is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-6600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i9-9900
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jul 02, 2015
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-6600T vs Core i9-9900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6600T vs Core i9-9900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6600T vs Core i9-9900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6600T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6600T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$213.00 | MSRP | $423.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
