In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i5-6600T is slower than the Core i9-11900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-6600T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-11900K
- Up to 20% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 118 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jul 02, 2015
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i5-6600T vs Core i9-11900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
118 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
88 FPS
100%
Price, $
$420.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.56/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6600T vs Core i9-11900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6600T vs Core i9-11900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6600T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6600T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-11900K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$213.00 | MSRP | $539.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
