In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-6600T is slower than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-6600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 02, 2015
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-6600T vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6600T vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6600T vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6600T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6600T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$213.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
