In Deathloop, the Core i5-6600T is slightly slower than the Core i7-930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-6600T
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Jul 02, 2015 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-930
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-6600T vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6600T vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6600T vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6600T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6600T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $213.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
