In Deathloop, the Core i5-6600T is slightly slower than the Core i3-4000M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-6600T
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jul 02, 2015 vs Sep 04, 2013
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 5% less energy – 35 vs 37 Watts
- Consumes up to 5% less energy
Core i3-4000M
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 220 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-6600T vs Core i3-4000M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6600T vs Core i3-4000M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6600T vs Core i3-4000M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6600T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i3-4000M
Sep 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6600T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4000M Sep 4th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Sep 4th, 2013 |
| $213.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 37 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
