In Deathloop, the Core i5-6600K is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-6600K
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Aug 05, 2015
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 65 vs 91 Watts
- Consumes up to 29% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-6600K vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6600K vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6600K vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6600K
Aug 5th, 2015
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
74%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6600K Aug 5th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 5th, 2015 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$242.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 91 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
