In Rust, the Core i5-660 is slower than the Core i9-13900. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $427 cheaper!
Core i5-660
- Up to 74% cheaper – $149.94 vs $576.99
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 66% better value in Rust – $0.71 vs $2.09/FPS
- Up to 66% better value in Rust
Core i9-13900
- Up to 32% faster in Rust – 275 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 65 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-660 vs Core i9-13900: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-660
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
209 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
45%
Price, $
$149.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
275 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
88 FPS
100%
Price, $
$576.99
25%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
34%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-660 vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-660 vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-660
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
24%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-660 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$196.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 73 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
