The Core i5-660 is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-3240 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $111.16 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-660
The Core i3-3240 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-3240
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 73% cheaper – $41.00 vs $152.16
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 55 vs 73 Watts
Core i5-660 vs Core i3-3240 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
133
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Core i5-660 vs Core i3-3240 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-660 vs Core i3-3240 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-660 vs Core i3-3240 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-660
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
98%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-660 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| $196.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| 73 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
