In Rust, the Core i5-660 is same performance as the Celeron G1610. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $93 more expensive!
Core i5-660
No clear advantages
Celeron G1610
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer – Dec 03, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 65% cheaper – $49.00 vs $141.87
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 66% better value in Rust – $0.23 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 66% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 55 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-660 vs Celeron G1610: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-660
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
100%
Price, $
$141.87
34%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
34%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
98%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-660 vs Celeron G1610 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-660 vs Celeron G1610 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-660
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-660 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| $196.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 73W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
