In Deathloop, the Core i5-6500TE is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $44 cheaper!
Core i5-6500TE
- Up to 8% cheaper – $489.95 vs $534.00
- Up to 8% cheaper
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Jan 28, 2025 vs Oct 11, 2015
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 3% better value in Deathloop – $2.18 vs $2.24/FPS
- Up to 3% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500TE vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500TE
Oct 11th, 2015
Average FPS
218 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
89%
Price, $
$489.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
97%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 28th, 2025
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$534
91%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500TE vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500TE vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500TE
Oct 11th, 2015
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
59%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 28th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500TE Oct 11th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 28th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 11th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 28th, 2025 |
$192.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
