In Control, the Core i5-6500TE is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $290 more expensive!
Core i5-6500TE
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i7-9700K
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 250 vs 248 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 3 years and 8 days newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Oct 11, 2015
- Is 3 years and 8 days newer
- Up to 59% cheaper – $199.99 vs $489.95
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 60% better value in Control – $0.79 vs $1.97/FPS
- Up to 60% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500TE vs Core i7-9700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500TE
Oct 11th, 2015
Average FPS
248 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
99%
Price, $
$489.95
40%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
40%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
250 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500TE vs Core i7-9700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500TE vs Core i7-9700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500TE
Oct 11th, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500TE Oct 11th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 11th, 2015 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
$192.00 | MSRP | $385.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
