In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-6500TE is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $391 more expensive!
Core i5-6500TE
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer – Oct 11, 2015 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 249 vs 231 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 80% cheaper – $98.95 vs $489.95
- Up to 80% cheaper
- Up to 82% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.39 vs $2.12/FPS
- Up to 82% better value in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500TE vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500TE
Oct 11th, 2015
Average FPS
231 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
93%
Price, $
$489.95
20%
Value, $/FPS
$2.12/FPS
18%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
187 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500TE vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500TE vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500TE
Oct 11th, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500TE Oct 11th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 11th, 2015 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $192.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
