In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-6500T is slightly slower than the Xeon E5645. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-6500T
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer – Jul 02, 2015 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5645
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 195 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500T vs Xeon E5645: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
182 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
93%
Price, $
$198.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500T vs Xeon E5645 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500T vs Xeon E5645 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
