In Deathloop, the Core i5-6500T is slightly slower than the Phenom II X6 1045T and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $139 more expensive!
Core i5-6500T
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Jul 02, 2015 vs Sep 01, 2010
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Phenom II X6 1045T
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 70% cheaper – $59.77 vs $198.95
- Up to 70% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in Deathloop – $0.26 vs $0.91/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500T vs Phenom II X6 1045T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
218 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$198.95
30%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
29%
Phenom II X6 1045T
Sep 1st, 2010
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.77
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500T vs Phenom II X6 1045T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500T vs Phenom II X6 1045T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Phenom II X6 1045T
Sep 1st, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
62%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Phenom II X6 1045T Sep 1st, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Sep 1st, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR2), 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
