In Rust, the Core i5-6500T is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-6500T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 10% faster in Rust – 237 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 02, 2015
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500T vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
216 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
76%
Price, $
$198.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
60%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
