In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-6500T is slightly slower than the Core i7-720QM and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $49 more expensive!
Core i5-6500T
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer – Jul 02, 2015 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-720QM
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 213 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 25% cheaper – $149.94 vs $198.95
- Up to 25% cheaper
- Up to 36% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.70 vs $1.09/FPS
- Up to 36% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500T vs Core i7-720QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
182 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
86%
Price, $
$198.95
75%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
64%
Core i7-720QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i7-720QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i7-720QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i7-720QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
62%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-720QM Sep 23rd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Sep 23rd, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $364.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
