In Rust, the Core i5-6500T is slightly slower than the Core i7-4800MQ and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $61 more expensive!
Core i5-6500T
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Jul 02, 2015 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
Core i7-4800MQ
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 218 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
- Up to 31% cheaper – $138.02 vs $198.95
- Up to 31% cheaper
- Up to 32% better value in Rust – $0.63 vs $0.92/FPS
- Up to 32% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500T vs Core i7-4800MQ: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
216 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
98%
Price, $
$198.95
69%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
68%
Core i7-4800MQ
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
49 FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i7-4800MQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i7-4800MQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i7-4800MQ
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4800MQ Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $380.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 47 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
