In Deathloop, the Core i5-6500T is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $182 cheaper!
Core i5-6500T
- Up to 48% cheaper – $198.95 vs $380.99
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 46% better value in Deathloop – $0.91 vs $1.70/FPS
- Up to 46% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 02, 2015
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500T vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
218 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$198.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380.99
52%
Value, $/FPS
$1.7/FPS
54%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
61%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
