In Atomfall, the Core i5-6500T is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600K and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $40 more expensive!
Core i5-6500T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 213 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jul 02, 2015
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 20% cheaper – $159.00 vs $198.95
- Up to 20% cheaper
- Up to 24% better value in Atomfall – $0.74 vs $0.98/FPS
- Up to 24% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500T vs Core i5-9600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
202 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
94%
Price, $
$198.95
79%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
76%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
