In Atomfall, the Core i5-6500T is slightly faster than the Core i5-3340M. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $145 more expensive!
Core i5-6500T
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 199 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Jul 02, 2015 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
Core i5-3340M
- Up to 73% cheaper – $54.04 vs $198.95
- Up to 73% cheaper
- Up to 72% better value in Atomfall – $0.28 vs $0.99/FPS
- Up to 72% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500T vs Core i5-3340M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
199 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
100%
Price, $
$198.95
27%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
28%
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
187 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
94%
Price, $
$54.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i5-3340M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i5-3340M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3340M Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
