In Deathloop, the Core i5-6500T is same performance as the Core i3-4160. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $174 more expensive!
Core i5-6500T
- Is 11 months and 11 days newer – Jul 02, 2015 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 11 months and 11 days newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4160
- Up to 87% cheaper – $24.99 vs $198.95
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in Deathloop – $0.11 vs $0.91/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500T vs Core i3-4160: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$198.95
12%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
12%
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$24.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i3-4160 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i3-4160 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4160 Jul 21st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
