In Atomfall, the Core i5-6500T is slightly faster than the Core i3-3217U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-6500T
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 200 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 30 days newer – Jul 02, 2015 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 3 years and 30 days newer
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500T vs Core i3-3217U: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$198.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i3-3217U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i3-3217U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 17 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
