In Rust, the Core i5-6500T is slightly faster than the Core i3-3210. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $40 more expensive!
Core i5-6500T
- Up to 3% faster in Rust – 216 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Rust
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Jul 02, 2015 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i3-3210
- Up to 20% cheaper – $159.00 vs $198.95
- Up to 20% cheaper
- Up to 17% better value in Rust – $0.76 vs $0.92/FPS
- Up to 17% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500T vs Core i3-3210: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
100%
Price, $
$198.95
79%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
83%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
209 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
85%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
