In Atomfall, the Core i5-6500T is slightly slower than the Core i3-10100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $99 more expensive!
Core i5-6500T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-10100
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 209 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 02, 2015
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 50% cheaper – $99.95 vs $198.95
- Up to 50% cheaper
- Up to 53% better value in Atomfall – $0.47 vs $0.99/FPS
- Up to 53% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500T vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
200 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
96%
Price, $
$198.95
50%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
47%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500T vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
72%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500T Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
