In Control, the Core i5-6500 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5649. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-6500
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 248 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Jul 02, 2015 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5649
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Core i5-6500 vs Xeon E5649: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6500 vs Xeon E5649 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6500 vs Xeon E5649 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6500
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon E5649
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6500 Jul 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5649 Feb 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
