In Atomfall, the Core i5-650 is slightly slower than the Xeon E3-1225. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-650
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 73 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 23% less energy
Xeon E3-1225
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 190 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer – Apr 03, 2011 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-650 vs Xeon E3-1225: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
188 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
99%
Price, $
$68.53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-650 vs Xeon E3-1225 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-650 vs Xeon E3-1225 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1225
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1225 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $176.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1155 |
73W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Intel HD P3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
