In Atomfall, the Core i5-650 is slightly slower than the FX-9370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-650
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 73 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
FX-9370
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Jun 11, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-650 vs FX-9370: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-650 vs FX-9370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-650 vs FX-9370 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
71%
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| $176.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | AM3+ |
73W | Power Consumption | 220W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
