In Deathloop, the Core i5-650 is same performance as the FX-8150. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $8 more expensive!
Core i5-650
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 73 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
FX-8150
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Oct 12, 2011 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
- Up to 12% cheaper – $59.94 vs $67.78
- Up to 12% cheaper
- Up to 10% better value in Deathloop – $0.27 vs $0.30/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-650 vs FX-8150: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$67.78
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
90%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$59.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-650 vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-650 vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $176.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | AM3+ |
73W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
