In Atomfall, the Core i5-650 is slightly slower than the FX-6350. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-650
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 73 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
FX-6350
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 187 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-650 vs FX-6350: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
187 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-650 vs FX-6350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-650 vs FX-6350 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| $176.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | AM3+ |
73W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
