In Deathloop, the Core i5-650 is same performance as the FX-6300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-650
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 73 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 23% less energy
FX-6300
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-650 vs FX-6300: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$40.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-650 vs FX-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-650 vs FX-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
71%
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $176.00 | MSRP | $132.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | AM3+ |
73W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
