In Atomfall, the Core i5-650 is slightly faster than the Celeron G1620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-650
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 186 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
Celeron G1620
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer – Dec 03, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 55 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-650 vs Celeron G1620: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-650 vs Celeron G1620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-650 vs Celeron G1620 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Celeron G1620
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1620 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| $176.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 73W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
