In Atomfall, the Core i5-650 is slightly faster than the Celeron B820. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-650
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
Celeron B820
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Jul 01, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-650 vs Celeron B820: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-650 vs Celeron B820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-650 vs Celeron B820 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2012 |
| $176.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 73W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
