In Atomfall, the Core i5-650 is slightly faster than the Celeron 3205U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-650
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 186 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Celeron 3205U
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 15 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-650 vs Celeron 3205U: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-650 vs Celeron 3205U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-650 vs Celeron 3205U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
83%
Celeron 3205U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 3205U Mar 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| $176.00 | MSRP | $107.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
| 73W | Power Consumption | 15W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
