In Atomfall, the Core i5-650 is slightly faster than the Celeron 1037U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-650
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 187 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Celeron 1037U
- Is 3 years and 13 days newer – Jan 20, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 13 days newer
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 17 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-650 vs Celeron 1037U: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
187 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
100%
Price, $
$67.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-650 vs Celeron 1037U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-650 vs Celeron 1037U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Celeron 1037U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 1037U Jan 20th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 20th, 2013 |
| $176.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 73W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
