Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3112 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Core i5-6400
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $56.68 vs $273.18
- Up to 76% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-14700F - $0.08 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Rocket League than Core i5-6400 - 796 vs 702 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 28 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
702
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1785 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
796
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
24%
Price, $
$273.18
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $273.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1783 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-6400 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |